Critically compare the doctrines of competence-competence adopted by American and French courts. Which is superior?

I will take the question of ‘which doctrine of competence
competence is stronger?’ to mean ‘under which legal system does the arbitrator
have the most power to rule on its own jurisdiction?’.
USA:
The doctrine of competence-competence is not mentioned in
the US Federal Arbitration Act. It is a doctrine developed by the judiciary,
and is intrinsically linked to the doctrine of separability, which is also a
construct of the judiciary.
The doctrine of separability in the arbitration context
holds that an arbitration clause in a contract is a distinct entity from the
rest of the contract. The case of Rent-A-Center,
West, Inc. v. Jackson used this concept to shape the current doctrine of
competence competence in the USA. In this case, Jackson argued that an
arbitrator could not logically be empowered to review its jurisdiction by the
very agreement that was being contested. It was held that the arbitration or
‘delegation’ clause was separate to the rest of the contract, and a clause
which empowered the arbitrator to determine its own authority would remain
valid unless it was this clause and not rest of the agreement which was
challenged as being invalid. This case was a strong affirmation of the positive
aspect to the principle of competence competence.
France:
In France, Article 1448 of the Civil Procedure Code was
introduced by decree in 2011 and this article affirmed the existence of a
principle of competence competence with both a positive and negative aspect. It
held that an arbitrator has priority over a judge to determine his own
jurisdiction, with the judge being unable to do this unless the arbitration
agreement is manifestly void or the arbitral tribunal is not yet in existence.
The parties are not able to alter this position by agreement; it is a
compulsory rule of law. Article 1465 confirms this position by stating that
“The arbitral tribunal has exclusive jurisdiction to rule on objections to its
jurisdiction”.
Which doctrine is
superior?
The French doctrine is superior as it has a positive and
negative aspect, a dual effect, which clearly gives the arbitrator more power
to determine its jurisdiction than the courts, whereas the US doctrine does not
give the arbitrators as much power as this to determine its own jurisdiction.
Law Tutors Online, Top Law Tutors Online, UK Law Tutor, UK Law Teacher, UK Law Notes, Manchester Law Tutor, Birmingham Law Tutor, Nottingham Law Tutor, Sheffield Law Tutor, Oxford Law Tutor, Oxbridge Law Tutor, Cambridge Law Tutor, Bristol Law Tutor, Liverpool Law Tutor, Edinburgh Law Tutor, Glasgow Law Tutor, Belfast Law Tutor, Dublin Law Tutor, Toronto Law Tutor, Vancouver Law Tutor, Montreal Law Tutor, New York Law Tutor, San Francisco Law Tutor, Sydney Law Tutor, Melbourne Law Tutor, Singapore Law Tutor, Hong Kong Law Tutor, Seoul Law Tutor, Paris Law Tutor, Los Angeles Law Tutor, San Francisco Law Tutor, Dubai Law Tutor, Boston Law Tutor, Chicago Law Tutor, Doha Law Tutor, Riyadh Law Tutor, Kuwait Law Tutor, Law Essay Help, LLM Tutor, LLM Law Tutor, PhD Law Tutor, Law Dissertation Help, Law Essay Writer, Law Dissertation Tutor, Law Essay Tutor, UK Law Essay, UK Law Tutors and London Law Tutor are trading names of London Law Tutor Ltd. which is a company registered in England and Wales. Company Registration Number: 08253481. VAT Registration Number: 160291824 Registered Data Controller: ZA236376 Registered office: Berkeley Square House, Berkeley Square, London, UK W1J 6BD. All Rights Reserved. Copyright © 2012-2023.